Of course, once the alleged woman who flour-bombed Kim Kardashian was slightly heard to have yelled “Fur hag!” shortly before the bag of flour was poured all over Kim’s back, people started assuming that the person had to something to do with PETA.
But, NO! says PETA. They were not behind the flour-bombing incident but they are quite glad about the attention thinking that Kim Kardashian would probably think twice now about wearing fur again.
“PETA has tried everything from polite letters to public protests, but Kim Kardashian has not been moved by the news that animals are beaten, electrocuted, and even skinned alive for real fur garments. Whoever threw that flour may reach her when our polite appeals did not.”
Is this fair? I know, I don’t like seeing people wear fur as well because of the cruelty that these animals have to go through but then again, harmless or not, what if the person thought of something else to pour over Kim other than flour? Would it still be funny then? I don’t think so.
Somehow, it makes me associate these types of acts to people who threatens doctors who perform abortion. Pretty scary.
Here’s the flour-bomber:
Photo Credit: Celebuzz