Word has gone out now from published declassified documents from Wikileaks that President Ferdinand Marcos and Imelda Marcos had parties that include a drag show of top Philippine Military Chiefs.
Should that even be news to us? I think it would be news if President Barack Obama held a birthday party with top US Military Chiefs dressed in drag, paraded through the Oval Office. Why? Because it is not part of their culture.
I remember when my mom turned 65, all the guys in the family dressed in drag and paraded in front of the guests which was received very well by many of the Filipino guests and some American guests. (Watch the video here) It has become so popular that other families took it on and followed suit. Videos have been posted on Youtube displaying the humor of such parades. I think the shock is more cultural than anything else. Heck, we even have Gay Santa Cruzan!
What do you think?
Here’s the write up from AFP:
Philippine dictator ‘staged military drag show’
(AFP) – 1 day ago
MANILA — Then-Philippine dictator Ferdinand Marcos forced his military chiefs to parade as women during a tasteless, sycophantic birthday party planned by his unstable wife, according to US diplomatic cables.
The US ambassador to the Philippines in the mid-1970s, William Sullivan, wrote a series of blistering criticisms of Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos in secret cables that have since been declassified and published by WikiLeaks.
In one of the reports, dated September 12, 1973, Sullivan recounted a “two-day blast” of a party for Ferdinand Marcos that he said was at odds with state-controlled media reports that he “spent a quiet birthday at his desk”.
“In general, every aspect of the occasion was too much, too long, and in questionable taste,” Sullivan wrote in the report to Washington.
Sullivan wrote that one of the lowest points was when military chiefs were required, under instructions from Imelda Marcos, to perform in a presidential palace floor show “in garish female attire”.
“This whole affair was a saccharine suffusion of sycophancy,” he wrote, according to the cables published on the website of the anti-secrecy organisation this week.
Ferdinand Marcos ruled the Philippines for nearly 20 years until an army-backed “people power” uprising involving millions of people forced him to flee into US exile in 1986. He died in Hawaii three years later.
While Sullivan appeared in the cables not to personally care much for either of the Marcoses, the United States supported the dictatorship until the final moments of the revolution.
Sullivan wrote repeatedly of what he saw as the personality flaws of Imelda Marcos, who cultivated immense power during her husband’s rule and famously lived a lavish lifestyle while most Filipinos endured brutal poverty.
In one cable, he warned British diplomats that Imelda would not be concerned about protocol in trying to get herself invited to Princess Anne’s wedding.
“First lady has reputation for royal manner of life style in Philippines and would not be above lobbying for invitation to British royal wedding,” he wrote.
In 1974 cables ahead of a visit by Imelda Marcos to the United States, Sullivan warned his head office that communist Chinese leaders had done a “very effective snow-job” that had coloured her outlook on the all things American.
Sullivan said she was particularly concerned by the friends her daughter, Imee, was associating with while studying at Princeton University.
“Given all this background, Imelda is in a slightly touchy state and a small offense or an untoward incident could spell lasting damage. She has not lost her sense of humor, but perspective is more than a bit awry,” he warned.
Imelda Marcos returned to the Philippines after her husband’s death and the family slowly regained some political power. Imelda is a congresswoman and her son, Ferdinand Jnr, is a senator eyeing a presidential run in 2016.